![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 08:59 pm, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi Pavel. > > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 08:32, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Here's prototype code for swsusp3. It seems to work for me, but don't > > try it... yet. Code is very ugly at places, sorry, I know and will fix > > it. This is just proof that it can be done, and that it can be done > > without excessive ammount of code. > > No comments on the code sorry. Instead I want to ask, could you please > find a different name? swsusp3 is going to make people think that it's > Suspend2 redesigned. Since there hasn't been a swsusp2 (so far as I > know), swsusp2 seems to be the common/trivial name for suspend2 (at least while struggling to get any kind of suspend working here, helpful people have refered to suspend2 as swsusp2) > how about using that name instead? At least then we'll clearly > differentiate the two implementations and you won't confuse/irritate > users. if he would use that people would get quite confused and not know if people mean your suspend2 or his swsusp2 Just a thought, Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-09-15 02:20 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||