[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] atomic: introduce atomic_inc_not_zero
    Russell King wrote:

    > The whole point about architecture specific includes is not to provide
    > a frenzied feeding ground for folk who like to "clean code up" but to
    > allow architectures to do things in the most efficient way for them
    > without polluting the kernel too much.
    > It seems that aspect is being lost sight of here.

    Yep. We've got atomic_add, atomic_sub, atomic_inc, atomic_dec,
    atomic_inc_return, atomic_add_return, atomic_dec_return, atomic_sub_return
    to start with.

    Not only that, but we can probably emulate all the atomic_ operations
    with atomic_cmpxchg, not just atomic_inc_not_zero.

    Roman: any ideas about what you would prefer? You'll notice
    atomic_inc_not_zero replaces rcuref_inc_lf, which is used several times
    in the VFS.


    SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

    Send instant messages to your online friends

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-09-15 03:56    [W:0.020 / U:7.064 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site