lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: 2.6.13.1 locks machine after some time, 2.6.12.5 work fine
    From
    Date
    On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 10:23 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    >
    > On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Norbert Kiesel wrote:
    > >
    > > Ok, I applied the patch and I'm running it right now, so far so good.
    > > Here is the the output of lspci from the patched 2.6.13.1 (not sure if a
    > > diff to the unpatched 2.6.13.1 or the 2.6.12.5 would be more useful, so
    > > I settled for no diff :-).
    >
    > Yes, now it looks better, except for a lspci quirk. You have:
    >
    > > 0000:00:10.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 0649
    > > Ultra ATA/100 PCI to ATA Host Controller (rev 01)
    >
    > and lspci reports:
    >
    > > Expansion ROM at 40000000 [disabled] [size=512K]
    >
    > where the "disabled" comes from the fact that it looks at the sysfs data
    > structures, and the resource is indeed marked as disabled there (because
    > nothing enabled it explicitly).
    >
    > But then reading the HW registers, we see:
    >
    > > 30: 01 00 00 40 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 01 02 04
    >
    > Ie now the ROM address value is 0x40000001, which means that as far as the
    > _hardware_ is concerned, the ROM is actually enabled.
    >
    > That's because the cmd64x driver enabled the ROM by just writing the
    > enable bit directly, and never actually told the resource layer that it
    > had done so. Not a big deal - we've properly allocated the resource
    > region, so there's no overlap, there's just this strange disconnect
    > between what the hardware thinks and what the resource handling things.
    >
    > Anyway, it all looks reasonable. Of course, exactly like with the hpt
    > driver, there doesn't seem to be any real _reason_ to enable the ROM in
    > the first place, and that code is #ifdef __i386__ anyway (so if there
    > _was_ a reason, it wouldn't work on anything else than an x86), so I
    > suspect we should just remove the ROM enable entirely.
    >
    > But it really shouldn't matter - at least we now enable the ROM
    > _correctly_, and I'm pretty sure (and certainly sincerely hope ;) that
    > your lockup is gone.
    >
    > Linus
    >

    Hi,
    system is stable again (I'm way beyond the point where I got lockups
    before). Thanks a bunch for the quick fix! I'd recommend to include
    this patch in 2.6.13.2.

    Best,
    Norbert

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-09-13 23:25    [W:0.023 / U:89.900 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site