Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sat, 10 Sep 2005 20:30:56 +0200 | | From | Harald Dunkel <> | | Subject | Re: Pure 64 bootloaders |
| |
Jeff Garzik wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >> Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com> writes: >> >> >>> I have been working on a project to create a Pure 64 bit distro of >>> linux, nothing 32 bit in the system. I can accomplish that with no >> >> >> >> Hopefully you're using /lib64 for that, otherwise your >> packages will be incompatible to everybody else and not FHS compliant. >> If you don't please don't submit any patches to hardcode this to >> upstream packages. > > > /lib64 is an awful scheme. I'd avoid it. >
Indeed. It just helps to keep unclean 32bit applications alive.
Maybe you would like to check Debian for amd64? The 32bit stuff is purely optional (except for the boot loaders, AFAIK).
http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/
Regards
Harri [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |