Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Sep 2005 03:59:39 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: GFS, what's remaining |
| |
David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi, this is the latest set of gfs patches, it includes some minor munging > since the previous set. Andrew, could this be added to -mm?
Dumb question: why?
Maybe I was asleep, but I don't recall seeing much discussion or exposition of
- Why the kernel needs two clustered fileystems
- Why GFS is better than OCFS2, or has functionality which OCFS2 cannot possibly gain (or vice versa)
- Relative merits of the two offerings
etc.
Maybe this has all been thrashed out and agreed to. If so, please remind me. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |