[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRE: FW: [RFC] A more general timeout specification

    On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Daniel Walker wrote:

    > > What "more versions" are you talking about? When you convert a user time
    > > to kernel time you can automatically validate it and later you can use
    > > standard kernel APIs, so you don't have to add even more API bloat.
    > What's kernel time? Are you talking about jiffies? The whole point of
    > multiple clocks is to allow for different degrees of precision.

    For a timeout? Please get real.
    If you need more precision, use a dedicated timer API, but don't make the
    general case more complex for the 99.99% of other users.

    bye, Roman
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-09-01 11:25    [W:0.018 / U:11.668 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site