![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:29:32AM +0200, Thomas Schlichter wrote: > I tested the attached patch during the last night and it sems to work... A quick feedback on your patch: A litmus test that I use is if "zero" lost ticks are being hit, which we should not w/o a patch like dynamic tick. I still see zero lost ticks being reported with your patch (during bootup atleast) which means all is still not well? -- Thanks and Regards, Srivatsa Vaddagiri, Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Labs, Bangalore, INDIA - 560017 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-09-01 09:26 [W:0.728 / U:0.570 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||