[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: FW: [RFC] A more general timeout specification

    On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Joe Korty wrote:

    > > When you convert a user time to kernel time you can
    > > automatically validate
    > Kernel time sucks. It is just a single clock, it may not have
    > the attributes of the clock that the user really wished to use.

    Wrong. The kernel time is simple and effective for almost all users.
    We are talking about _timeouts_ here, what fancy "attributes" does that
    need that are just not overkill?

    bye, Roman
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-09-01 16:37    [W:0.053 / U:50.764 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site