[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: FW: [RFC] A more general timeout specification

On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Joe Korty wrote:

> > When you convert a user time to kernel time you can
> > automatically validate
> Kernel time sucks. It is just a single clock, it may not have
> the attributes of the clock that the user really wished to use.

Wrong. The kernel time is simple and effective for almost all users.
We are talking about _timeouts_ here, what fancy "attributes" does that
need that are just not overkill?

bye, Roman
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-01 16:37    [W:0.089 / U:0.488 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site