lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: GFS, what's remaining
FromAlan Cox <>
DateThu, 01 Sep 2005 15:49:18 +0100
On Iau, 2005-09-01 at 03:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> - Why the kernel needs two clustered fileystems

So delete reiserfs4, FAT, VFAT, ext2, and all the other "junk". 

> - Why GFS is better than OCFS2, or has functionality which OCFS2 cannot
>   possibly gain (or vice versa)
> 
> - Relative merits of the two offerings

You missed the important one - people actively use it and have been for
some years. Same reason with have NTFS, HPFS, and all the others. On
that alone it makes sense to include.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-01 16:28    [W:0.931 / U:0.370 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans