Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 08 Aug 2005 10:53:02 -0700 | From | Zach Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 6700/6702PXH quirk |
| |
> You can hide the "complexity" of the second line behind > macros. And this is what is done in most places.
oh, I agree. My only point is that if the *only* argument against bitfields is that they're inefficient (insert vague hand-waving) then people will happily decide to live with that inefficiency. I'm all for macros that are both efficient *and* abstract away the risk of getting open-coding wrong.
- z - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |