Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 06 Aug 2005 09:39:45 +0200 | From | "scientica (GMail)" <> | Subject | Re: [ck] 2.6.12-ck5 |
| |
Con Kolivas wrote:
>-schediso2.12.diff >SCHED_ISO was dropped entirely. It broke in ck4, and there is now a decent >defacto standard for unprivileged realtime in mainline kernel with realtime >RLIMITS so I'm supporting the use of that instead. > > Just a silly question, what will happen if one tries to set SCHED_ISO (with eg schedtool))? will the program just coninue as SCHED_NORM or die by some signal?
(btw, I add myself to the array of people that will miss SCHED_ISO :)
also, how does the RLIMITS work? (ie, how does one set that on a proccess, is it poosible to use schedtool to do that?)
Cheers Fredrik
-- After all, if you are in school to study computer science, then a professor saying: "use this proprietary software to learn computer science" is the same as English professor handing you a copy of Shakespeare and saying: "use this book to learn Shakespeare without opening the book itself." -- Bradley Kuhn
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |