lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 06 Aug 2005 09:39:45 +0200
From"scientica (GMail)" <>
SubjectRe: [ck] 2.6.12-ck5
Con Kolivas wrote:

>-schediso2.12.diff
>SCHED_ISO was dropped entirely. It broke in ck4, and there is now a decent 
>defacto standard for unprivileged realtime in mainline kernel with realtime 
>RLIMITS so I'm supporting the use of that instead.
> 
>
Just a silly question, what will happen if one tries to set SCHED_ISO
(with eg schedtool))? will the program just coninue as SCHED_NORM or die
by some signal?

(btw, I add myself to the array of people that will miss SCHED_ISO :)

also, how does the RLIMITS work? (ie, how does one set that on a
proccess, is it poosible to use schedtool to do that?)

Cheers
Fredrik

-- 
After all, if you are in school to study computer science, then a
professor saying: 
 "use this proprietary software to learn computer science" is the
same as English professor handing you a copy of Shakespeare
and saying:
 "use this book to learn Shakespeare without opening the book itself."
  -- Bradley Kuhn

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-06 09:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2008