Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:49:33 -0700 (PDT) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: NUMA policy interface |
| |
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> None of them seem very attractive to me. I would prefer to just > not support external accesses keeping things lean and fast.
That is a surprising statement given what we just discussed. Things are not lean and fast but weirdly screwed up. The policy layer is significantly impacted by historical contingencies rather than designed in a clean way. It cannot even deliver the functionality it was designed to deliver (see BIND).
> Individual physical page migration is quite different from > address space migration.
Address space migration? That is something new in this discussion. So could you explain what you mean by that? I have looked at page migration in a variety of contexts and could not see much difference. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |