[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [UPDATE PATCH] push rounding up of relative request to schedule_timeout()
    On 8/4/05, George Anzinger <> wrote:
    > Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
    > ~
    > > Sorry, I forgot that sys_nanosleep() also always adds 1 to the request
    > > (to account for this same issue, I believe, as POSIX demands no early
    > > return from nanosleep() calls). There are some other locations where
    > > similar
    > >
    > > + (t.tv_sec || t.tv_nsec)
    > This is not the same as "always add 1". We don't do it this way just to
    > have fun with C. If you change schedule_timeout() to add the 1,
    > nanosleep() will need to do things differently to get the same behavior.
    > (And, YES users do pass in zero sleep times.)

    Fair enough. Will need to think about this more.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-08-04 20:57    [W:0.021 / U:0.260 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site