[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: FW: [RFC] A more general timeout specification
    Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote:

    >>I can get the first sleep. Suppose I oversleep by X nanoseconds. I
    >>wake, and get an opaque timeout back. How do I ask for the new wake
    >>time to be "endtime + INTERVAL"?
    > endtime.ts += INTERVAL
    > [we all know opaque is relative too]

    Heh. Okay, then what are the rules about what I'm allowed to do with
    endtime? Joe mentioned there was a bit in there somewhere to denote
    absolute time.

    > Or better, use itimers :)

    I as actually thinking in terms of implementing itimers on top of your
    new API.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-09-01 01:09    [W:0.023 / U:104.832 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site