[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: FW: [RFC] A more general timeout specification
Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote:

>>I can get the first sleep. Suppose I oversleep by X nanoseconds. I
>>wake, and get an opaque timeout back. How do I ask for the new wake
>>time to be "endtime + INTERVAL"?
> endtime.ts += INTERVAL
> [we all know opaque is relative too]

Heh. Okay, then what are the rules about what I'm allowed to do with
endtime? Joe mentioned there was a bit in there somewhere to denote
absolute time.

> Or better, use itimers :)

I as actually thinking in terms of implementing itimers on top of your
new API.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-01 01:09    [W:0.028 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site