[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Where is the performance bottleneck?
On Wed, Aug 31 2005, jmerkey wrote:
> 512 is not enough. It has to be larger. I just tried 512 and it still
> limits the data rates.

Please don't top post.

512 wasn't the point, setting it properly is the point. If you need more
than 512, go ahead. This isn't Holger's problem, though, the reading
would be much faster if it was. If the fusion is using a large queue
depth, increasing nr_requests would likely help the writes (but not to
the extent of where it would suddenly be as fast as it should).

Jens Axboe

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-31 19:34    [W:0.034 / U:1.356 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site