[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] Implement shared page tables

> > Which is indeed a further disincentive against shared page tables.
> Or shared pagetables a disincentive to randomizing the mmap space ;-)
> They're incompatible, but you could be left to choose one or the other
> via config option.
> 3% on "a certain industry-standard database benchmark" (cough) is huge,
> and we expect the benefit for PPC64 will be larger as we can share the
> underlying hardware PTEs without TLB flushing as well.

surely the benchmark people know that the database in question always
mmaps the shared area at the address where the first one started it?
(if not, could make it so ;)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-31 16:44    [W:0.030 / U:4.788 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site