lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.6.13 2/2] New Syscall: get/set rlimits of any process (udate)
From
Date
The patch for the setprlimit() syscall:


Signed-off-by: Wieland Gmeiner <e8607062@student.tuwien.ac.at>



---

arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S | 1
include/asm-i386/unistd.h | 3 -
kernel/sys.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
security/selinux/hooks.c | 14 +++-
4 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S~setprlimit arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S
--- linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S~setprlimit 2005-08-31 02:56:22.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13-wieland/arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S 2005-08-31 02:58:31.000000000 +0200
@@ -295,3 +295,4 @@ ENTRY(sys_call_table)
.long sys_inotify_add_watch
.long sys_inotify_rm_watch
.long sys_getprlimit
+ .long sys_setprlimit /* 295 */
diff -puN include/asm-i386/unistd.h~setprlimit include/asm-i386/unistd.h
--- linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/unistd.h~setprlimit 2005-08-31 02:56:22.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13-wieland/include/asm-i386/unistd.h 2005-08-31 02:59:16.000000000 +0200
@@ -300,8 +300,9 @@
#define __NR_inotify_add_watch 292
#define __NR_inotify_rm_watch 293
#define __NR_getprlimit 294
+#define __NR_setprlimit 295

-#define NR_syscalls 295
+#define NR_syscalls 296

/*
* user-visible error numbers are in the range -1 - -128: see
diff -puN kernel/sys.c~setprlimit kernel/sys.c
--- linux-2.6.13/kernel/sys.c~setprlimit 2005-08-31 02:56:22.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13-wieland/kernel/sys.c 2005-08-31 03:02:47.000000000 +0200
@@ -1600,6 +1600,78 @@ asmlinkage long sys_getrlimit(unsigned i
return rlim_do_getprlimit(0, resource, rlim);
}

+static inline long rlim_do_setprlimit(pid_t pid, unsigned int resource,
+ struct rlimit __user *rlim)
+{
+ struct rlimit new_rlim, *old_rlim;
+ int retval;
+ task_t *p;
+
+ if (resource >= RLIM_NLIMITS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (pid < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if(copy_from_user(&new_rlim, rlim, sizeof(*rlim)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ if (new_rlim.rlim_cur > new_rlim.rlim_max)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ retval = -ESRCH;
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ if (pid == 0) {
+ p = current;
+ } else {
+ p = find_task_by_pid(pid);
+ }
+ if (p) {
+ retval = -EPERM;
+ if (pid && !prlim_check_perm(p))
+ goto out;
+
+ old_rlim = p->signal->rlim + resource;
+ if ((new_rlim.rlim_max > old_rlim->rlim_max) &&
+ !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
+ goto out;
+ if (resource == RLIMIT_NOFILE && new_rlim.rlim_max > NR_OPEN)
+ goto out;
+
+ retval = security_task_rlimit(p, resource, &new_rlim);
+ if (retval)
+ goto out;
+
+ task_lock(p->group_leader);
+ *old_rlim = new_rlim;
+ task_unlock(p->group_leader);
+
+ if (resource == RLIMIT_CPU &&
+ new_rlim.rlim_cur != RLIM_INFINITY &&
+ (cputime_eq(p->signal->it_prof_expires, cputime_zero) ||
+ new_rlim.rlim_cur <= cputime_to_secs(
+ p->signal->it_prof_expires))) {
+ cputime_t cputime = secs_to_cputime(new_rlim.rlim_cur);
+ spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
+ set_process_cpu_timer(p, CPUCLOCK_PROF,
+ &cputime, NULL);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
+ }
+ }
+
+out:
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ return retval;
+}
+
+asmlinkage long sys_setprlimit(pid_t pid, unsigned int resource,
+ struct rlimit __user *rlim)
+{
+ return rlim_do_setprlimit(pid, resource, rlim);
+}
+
+asmlinkage long sys_setrlimit(unsigned int resource, struct rlimit __user *rlim)
+{
+ return rlim_do_setprlimit(0, resource, rlim);
+}
+
#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_SYS_OLD_GETRLIMIT

/*
@@ -1624,48 +1696,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_old_getrlimit(unsign

#endif

-asmlinkage long sys_setrlimit(unsigned int resource, struct rlimit __user *rlim)
-{
- struct rlimit new_rlim, *old_rlim;
- int retval;
-
- if (resource >= RLIM_NLIMITS)
- return -EINVAL;
- if(copy_from_user(&new_rlim, rlim, sizeof(*rlim)))
- return -EFAULT;
- if (new_rlim.rlim_cur > new_rlim.rlim_max)
- return -EINVAL;
- old_rlim = current->signal->rlim + resource;
- if ((new_rlim.rlim_max > old_rlim->rlim_max) &&
- !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
- return -EPERM;
- if (resource == RLIMIT_NOFILE && new_rlim.rlim_max > NR_OPEN)
- return -EPERM;
-
- retval = security_task_rlimit(0, resource, &new_rlim);
- if (retval)
- return retval;
-
- task_lock(current->group_leader);
- *old_rlim = new_rlim;
- task_unlock(current->group_leader);
-
- if (resource == RLIMIT_CPU && new_rlim.rlim_cur != RLIM_INFINITY &&
- (cputime_eq(current->signal->it_prof_expires, cputime_zero) ||
- new_rlim.rlim_cur <= cputime_to_secs(
- current->signal->it_prof_expires))) {
- cputime_t cputime = secs_to_cputime(new_rlim.rlim_cur);
- read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
- set_process_cpu_timer(current, CPUCLOCK_PROF,
- &cputime, NULL);
- spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
- read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* It would make sense to put struct rusage in the task_struct,
* except that would make the task_struct be *really big*. After
diff -puN security/selinux/hooks.c~setprlimit security/selinux/hooks.c
--- linux-2.6.13/security/selinux/hooks.c~setprlimit 2005-08-31 02:56:22.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13-wieland/security/selinux/hooks.c 2005-08-31 03:07:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -2710,21 +2710,27 @@ static int selinux_task_rlimit(struct ta
struct rlimit *old_rlim = p->signal->rlim + resource;
int rc;

+ /* getprlimit */
if (!new_rlim)
rc = secondary_ops->task_rlimit(p, resource, 0);
- else
+ /* setrlimit */
+ else if (p == current)
rc = secondary_ops->task_rlimit(0, resource, new_rlim);
+ /* setprlimit */
+ else
+ rc = secondary_ops->task_rlimit(p, resource, new_rlim);
if (rc)
return rc;

- if (!new_rlim)
- return task_has_perm(current, p, PROCESS__PTRACE);
/* Control the ability to change the hard limit (whether
lowering or raising it), so that the hard limit can
later be used as a safe reset point for the soft limit
upon context transitions. See selinux_bprm_apply_creds. */
- else if (p == current && old_rlim->rlim_max != new_rlim->rlim_max)
+ if (p == current && new_rlim &&
+ old_rlim->rlim_max != new_rlim->rlim_max)
return task_has_perm(current, current, PROCESS__SETRLIMIT);
+ else
+ return task_has_perm(current, p, PROCESS__PTRACE);

return 0;
}
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-31 14:55    [W:0.054 / U:20.284 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site