[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01

On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 05:24, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> Well, I just spent several hours trying to use the b_update_lock in
> implementing something to replace the bit spinlocks for RT. It's
> getting really ugly and I just hit a stone wall.
> The problem is that I have two locks to work with. A
> jbd_lock_bh_journal_head and a jbd_lock_bh_state. ...

For now, yes.

> So, the only other solutions that I can think of is:
> a) add yet another (bloat) lock to the buffer head.

This one looks like the right answer for now, just to get the patch
series running. I've got a WIP patch under development which removes
the bh_journal_head lock entirely; if that works out, you may find
things get a bit easier.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-30 13:03    [W:0.160 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site