[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i386, x86_64 Initial PAT implementation
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 03:45:36PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2005-08-29 at 18:20 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > ways. Currently this code only allows for an additional flavor
> > of uncached access to physical memory addresses which should be hard
> > to abuse, and should raise no additional aliasing problems. No
> > attempt has been made to fix theoretical aliasing problems.
> Even an uncached/cached alias causes random memory corruption or an MCE
> on x86 systems. In fact it can occur even for an alias not in theory
> touched by the CPU if it happens to prefetch into or speculate the
> address.
> Also be sure to read the PII Xeon errata - early PAT has a bug or two.

There are various PAT errata all the way through to Pentium-M iirc.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-30 19:10    [W:0.084 / U:3.440 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site