![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi, Shaohua Li wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 23:16 +0200, matthieu castet wrote: > >>There are drivers/acpi/motherboard.c that done some stuff already handle >>by pnp/system.c. > > Yes, it should be disabled if pnpacpi is enabled. But even if pnpacpi is disabled, pnp/system.c sould work with pnpbios. > The only concern is > motherboard.c also request some ACPI resources, which might not declaim > in ACPI motherboard device, but it's completely BIOS dependent. We might > could try remove it at -mm tree to see if it breaks any system later. > > Ok, may be we should split in 2 modules : the one that request some ACPI resources and the other that use PNP resource. >>PS : I saw in acpi ols paper that you plan once all dupe acpi drivers >>will be removed to register again the pnp device in acpi layer. Do you >>plan to add more check and for example add only device that have a CRS >>in pnp layer ? > > For detecting PNP device? it's worthy trying. > I will send a patch for that. Matthieu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-08-28 19:43 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||