[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Kernel 2.6.13-rc7 Latency Question

On 8/27/05, Justin Piszcz <> wrote:
> These options are self-explanatory:
> x x ( ) No Forced Preemption (Server) x
> x x x ( ) Voluntary Kernel Preemption (Desktop) x
> x x x (X) Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop) x x
> It says 100 HZ or 250 HZ is good for SMP systems; however, what if I am
> using a P4 machine with 1 CPU (HT), is 1000HZ still the way to go, as its
> not really 2 *REAL* cpus?

I use 1000HZ on my P4 machine, HT enabled, staircase scheduler.

See LKML topic "Schedulers benchmark" if you want more
information/benchmarks results.

Michal Piotrowski
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-27 12:16    [W:0.026 / U:1.900 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site