[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
    On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 20:00 -0400, Daniel B. wrote:
    > Alan Cox wrote:
    > > On Sul, 2005-06-19 at 18:55, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > > > If we are serious about utf-8 support in ext3, we should return
    > > > -EINVAL if someone passes non-canonical utf-8 string.
    > >
    > > That would ironically not be standards compliant
    > Which standards?

    Probably POSIX, SuSv3 and similiar.

    > The standards I've read (mostly XML- and web-related specs)
    > do say that non-standard UTF-8 octet sequences should be rejected.

    There you have basically text files with some structure in it and the
    definiton/requirement that is is UTF-8.
    At kernel level these are also just byte streams and the kernel doesn't
    know or care which charset, encoding, file format, font etc. the data is
    used with or interpreted several layers higher, e.g. for presenting to
    the user. And the same holds for filenames.

    Firmix Software GmbH
    mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
    Embedded Linux Development and Services

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-08-26 10:37    [W:0.035 / U:4.884 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site