[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: process creation time increases linearly with shmem

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > Well, I still don't think we need to test vm_file. We can add an
> > anon_vma test if you like, if we really want to minimize the fork
> > overhead, in favour of later faults. Do we?
> When you consider NUMA placement (the child process may
> end up running elsewhere), allocating things like page
> tables lazily may well end up being a performance win.

It should be easy enough to benchmark something like kernel compiles etc,
which are reasonably fork-rich and should show a good mix for something
like this. Or even just something like "time to restart a X session" after
you've brought it into memory once.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.062 / U:1.944 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site