[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] Rework stubs in security.h
* Stephen Smalley ( wrote:
> That one isn't so much an issue as the xattr ones and vm_enough_memory
> case. But more generally, if you think about moving toward a place
> where one can grant privileges to processes based solely on their
> role/domain, you'll need the same ability for capable and other hooks
> too. Naturally, that can't be done safely without a lot more work on
> userspace and policy, but it is a long term goal.

Right, you've mentioned that before, thanks for bringing that up.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-26 20:11    [W:0.057 / U:6.092 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site