[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.4] (5/5) I2C updates for 2.4.32-pre3
Hi Marcelo,

> All of these seem to be cleanups/cosmetic enhancements rather than
> real bugfixes, except the ML address update.

Patches 1/5, 3/5 and 4/5 are typo fixes in documentation and comments.
5/5 however qualifies as (minor) bug fix IMHO, as missing newlines in
log messages will cause the next message's log level not to be
interpreted as such.

> As you know, we've been trying to reduce the scope of patch acceptance
> in v2.4.x to strictly necessary changes.
> Do any of these fall into this criteria?

I sent you these patches because I thought they were worth applying,
obviously, so don't ask me. Apply them or discard them as you feel like,
it's really up to you, not me. From that, I'll know what kind of patches
are worth sending next time.

Jean Delvare
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-24 23:46    [W:0.048 / U:3.720 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site