lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, john stultz wrote:
>
>
>>I'm assuming gettimeofday()/clock_gettime() looks something like:
>> xtime + (get_cycles()-last_update)*(mult+ntp_adj)>>shift
>
>
> Where did you get the ntp_adj from? It's not in my example.
> gettimeofday() was in the previous mail: "xtime + (cycle_offset * mult +
> error) >> shift". The difference between system time and reference
> time is really important. gettimeofday() returns the system time, NTP
> controls the reference time and these two are synchronized regularly.
> I didn't see that anywhere in your example.
>
John,
If I read your example right, the problem is when the NTP adjustment
changes while the two clocks are out of sync (because of a late tick).
It would appear that gettimeofday would need to know that the NTP
adjustment is changing (and to what). It would also appear that this
is known by the ntp code and could be made available to gettimeofday.
If it is changing due to an NTP call, that system call, itself,
should/must force synchronization. So the only case gettimeofday needs
to worry/know about is that an adjustment is to change at time X to
value Y. Also, me thinks there is only one such change that can be
present at any given time.

Hope this helps...
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
HRT (High-res-timers): http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-24 02:33    [W:0.153 / U:1.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site