[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: select() efficiency / epoll
    Thanks for the info.. I did find this thread and was wondering if this 
    patch ever got put in

    Willy Tarreau wrote:

    >On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:24:42AM -0500, Davy Durham wrote:
    >>That's probably a good idea. Where would I find out what other projects
    >>use it?
    >I use it in my load-balancer (haproxy), and it could somewhat match your
    >needs, because I ported the select()-based earlier version to epoll() with
    >the smallest possible changes. Indeed, the new epoll() loop still uses the
    >FD_ISSET() to determine what to do with epoll_ctl(). If you have changed
    >your code to use select(), you may find similarities. But I want to tell
    >you from now that my code is NOT multi-threaded. It could be a bug in the
    >epoll implementation, because I don't think that there are so many
    >applications using epoll on MT models. Bert says that the epoll implementation
    >is heavily benchmarked, which is true, but which does not guarantee that it
    >is tested under every condition.
    >You can download it from there :
    >Use version 1.2.6. I added epoll in 1.2.5, so the diff between 1.2.4 and
    >1.2.5 could help you too.
    >Good luck !
    >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    >the body of a message to
    >More majordomo info at
    >Please read the FAQ at

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-08-23 21:56    [W:0.022 / U:2.668 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site