[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: some missing spin_unlocks

    > This one needs more care. We can't drop the lock, because
    > the destroy actions need to be protected by that lock, but
    > we can't release the lock after rose_destroy_socket() because
    > the object may not even exist any longer.

    does it matter? can ANYTHING be spinning on the lock? if not .. can we
    just let the lock go poof and not unlock it...

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-08-23 18:57    [W:0.021 / U:18.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site