lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: some missing spin_unlocks
    From
    Date

    > This one needs more care. We can't drop the lock, because
    > the destroy actions need to be protected by that lock, but
    > we can't release the lock after rose_destroy_socket() because
    > the object may not even exist any longer.


    does it matter? can ANYTHING be spinning on the lock? if not .. can we
    just let the lock go poof and not unlock it...

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-08-23 18:57    [W:0.020 / U:0.664 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site