[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: some missing spin_unlocks

> This one needs more care. We can't drop the lock, because
> the destroy actions need to be protected by that lock, but
> we can't release the lock after rose_destroy_socket() because
> the object may not even exist any longer.

does it matter? can ANYTHING be spinning on the lock? if not .. can we
just let the lock go poof and not unlock it...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-23 18:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean