lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: some missing spin_unlocks
From
Date

> This one needs more care. We can't drop the lock, because
> the destroy actions need to be protected by that lock, but
> we can't release the lock after rose_destroy_socket() because
> the object may not even exist any longer.


does it matter? can ANYTHING be spinning on the lock? if not .. can we
just let the lock go poof and not unlock it...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-23 18:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site