lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
Date
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:44, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> On 8/21/05, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> > Well it will survive all right, but eventually get into swap thrash
> > territory and that's not a meaningful cpu scheduler benchmark.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Con
>
> Ok. How about make -j? It's one of kernbench test runs, on my box load
> average > 1500 ;).

Just do that if you wish to overload the system. It's a vm benchmark. No doubt
the cpu scheduler contributes to how the vm behaves, but it isn't a primary
cpu scheduler test.

> BTW I have only 1 gb ram, so high values of -j are road to hell for my
> system... I'm still learning, but it's fun ;). Now I'll try your latest
> -ck. Thanks for "1Gb Low Memory Support".

You're welcome,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-21 06:52    [W:0.063 / U:4.288 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site