Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH/RFT 4/5] CLOCK-Pro page replacement | Date | Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:04:56 -0400 | From | Horst von Brand <> |
| |
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 00:10 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > > > I believe we just ignored sparc64. That usually works for solving these > > > kind of bugs. 8) > > > > heh. iirc, it was demonstrable on x86 also. > > No. gcc-2.95 on Sparc64 put uninititialized vars into the bss, ignoring > the __attribute__((section(".data.percpu"))) directive. x86 certainly > doesn't have this, I just tested it w/2.95. > > Really, it's Sparc64 + gcc-2.95. Send an urgent telegram to the user > telling them to upgrade.
I recently asked if gcc-2.95 was really still supported, and was told that it is in common use for its speed... -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |