Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 2 Aug 2005 12:56:19 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: revert yenta free_irq on suspend |
| |
Hi!
> > Also, as I said earlier, the better we support OSPM initiated power > > management, the more likely APM will break. This may be technically > > unavoidable on some isolated boxes without quirks. I agree with > > Pavel that "do nothing" may make sense, but it seems some devices > > may still need to be disabled by the OS. As a real world example, > > we currently can't turn off cardbus bridges because it breaks APM > > on a couple of older laptops. > > Won't freeing of IRQs cause problems with things like handhelds that > actually rely on an interrupt to wake up ?
Well, you probably don't want to free IRQ that is used for wakeup; but if driver is used for wakeup, it probably needs some special handling, anyway (right?). Pavel -- teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |