lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Patch] don't kick ALB in the presence of pinned task

* Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:

> Jack Steiner brought this issue at my OLS talk.
>
> Take a scenario where two tasks are pinned to two HT threads in a physical
> package. Idle packages in the system will keep kicking migration_thread
> on the busy package with out any success.
>
> We will run into similar scenarios in the presence of CMP/NUMA.
>
> Patch appended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>

nice catch!

fine for -mm, but i dont think we need this fix in 2.6.13, as the effect
of the bug is an extra context-switch per 'CPU goes idle' event, in this
very specific (and arguably broken) task binding scenario. In a
worst-case scenario a CPU going idle can 'spam' that other CPU with
migration requests, but it still seems like a pretty artificial workload
scenario where the system has significant idle time left. I have tested
your fix on a HT box and it solves the problem.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-02 11:30    [W:0.104 / U:1.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site