lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
Date
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 01:28 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 05:09 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > here are interbench v0.29 resoults:
>
> The X test under simulated "Compile" load looks most interesting.
>
> Most of the schedulers do quite poorly on this test - only Zaphod with
> default max_ia_bonus and max_tpt_bonus manages to deliver under 100ms
> max latency. As expected with interactivity bonus disabled it performs
> horribly.

The compile load is not a real compile load; it is an extreme exaggeration of
what happens during a compile and this is done to increase the sensitivity of
this test. It is _not_ worth trying to get a perfect score in this.

> I'd like to see some results with X reniced to -10. Despite what the
> 2.6 release notes say, this still seems to make a difference.

Well of course it helps X - but then any X load totally fscks up audio on
mainline and staircase which is why it's recommended not to renice it.

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-19 05:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site