[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
    On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 01:28 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
    > On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 05:09 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
    > > Hi,
    > > here are interbench v0.29 resoults:
    > The X test under simulated "Compile" load looks most interesting.
    > Most of the schedulers do quite poorly on this test - only Zaphod with
    > default max_ia_bonus and max_tpt_bonus manages to deliver under 100ms
    > max latency. As expected with interactivity bonus disabled it performs
    > horribly.

    The compile load is not a real compile load; it is an extreme exaggeration of
    what happens during a compile and this is done to increase the sensitivity of
    this test. It is _not_ worth trying to get a perfect score in this.

    > I'd like to see some results with X reniced to -10. Despite what the
    > 2.6 release notes say, this still seems to make a difference.

    Well of course it helps X - but then any X load totally fscks up audio on
    mainline and staircase which is why it's recommended not to renice it.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-08-19 05:53    [W:0.023 / U:74.172 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site