lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i386 !NUMA node_to_cpumask broken in early boot
> Thanks for the feedback, ugly indeed, i was really trying to avoid adding 
> a new API function or extra cpu_* variables. Ok, here is an
> early_node_to_cpumask instead.

Thinking about it again it's most likely broken with CPU hotplug anyways
whatever you're doing. So how does your code handle adding new
CPUs? If it does can the normal CPU bootup be handled in the
same way. Then this wouldn't be needed at all.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-19 05:08    [W:0.047 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site