![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:26:07 +0200
>
>
>>- my impression is that the older compilers are only rarely
>> used, so miscompilations of a driver with an old gcc might
>> not be detected for a longer amount of time
>
>
> Many people still use 2.95 because it's still the fastest
> way to get a kernel build done and that's important for
> many people.
>
> And with 4.0 being a scary regression in the compile time
> performance area compared to 3.4, this becomes even more
> important to keep around.
I don't mean to offend anyone, but it seems that the gcc project, at
least WRT x86, has lost its way a bit. The compiler is getting slower,
and the generated code is not getting correspondingly faster. Or
smaller. I'm not sure about more correct...
Keeping 2.95 might not be a bad idea.
--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-08-10 21:39 [W:0.673 / U:0.340 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||