Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 8 Jul 2005 21:11:21 +0200 (CEST) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: share/private/slave a subtree - define vs enum |
| |
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> I don't see how the following is tortured: > enum { > PNODE_MEMBER_VFS = 0x01, > PNODE_SLAVE_VFS = 0x02 > }; > In fact, I think it is more natural. An almost identical example even appears > in K&R.
So it basically comes down to personal preference, if the original uses defines and it works fine, I don't really see a good enough reason to change it to enums, so please leave the decision to author.
bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |