Messages in this thread | | | From | "Timothy R. Chavez" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name | Date | Thu, 7 Jul 2005 17:08:31 -0500 |
| |
On Thursday 07 July 2005 16:31, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 15:48 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > > > Tim's code lets you say I want change notification to this file only. The > > notification follows the audit format with all relavant pieces of information > > gathered at the time of the event and serialized with all other events. > > well can't you sort of do that based on (selinux) security context of > the file already? after all that's part of the inode already. Isn't that > finegrained enough? >
Provided you make it that far, yes, SE Linux _could_ be used to provide similar functionality. But, what if you bottom out on a DAC decision?
[foo@liltux /]$ cat /etc/shadow cat: /etc/shadow: Permission denied
-tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |