[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [0/48] Suspend2 for 2.6.12

    On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:04, Matthew Garrett wrote:
    > Nigel Cunningham <> wrote:
    > > I've been thinking about this some more and wondering whether I should
    > > just replace swsusp. I really don't want to step on your toes though.
    > > What would you like to see happen?
    > Do you implement the entire swsusp userspace interface? If not, removing
    > it probably isn't a reasonable plan without fair warning.

    I'm not suggesting removing the sysfs interface or replacing system to
    ram - just the suspend to disk part.


    Enumerate the requirements.
    Consider the interdependencies.
    Calculate the probabilities.
    Be amazed that people believe it happened.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-07-07 14:27    [W:0.020 / U:69.604 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site