[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [0/48] Suspend2 for 2.6.12

On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:04, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Nigel Cunningham <> wrote:
> > I've been thinking about this some more and wondering whether I should
> > just replace swsusp. I really don't want to step on your toes though.
> > What would you like to see happen?
> Do you implement the entire swsusp userspace interface? If not, removing
> it probably isn't a reasonable plan without fair warning.

I'm not suggesting removing the sysfs interface or replacing system to
ram - just the suspend to disk part.


Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-07 14:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean