lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12
    From
    Date
    Hi.

    On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:04, Matthew Garrett wrote:
    > Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com> wrote:
    >
    > > I've been thinking about this some more and wondering whether I should
    > > just replace swsusp. I really don't want to step on your toes though.
    > > What would you like to see happen?
    >
    > Do you implement the entire swsusp userspace interface? If not, removing
    > it probably isn't a reasonable plan without fair warning.

    I'm not suggesting removing the sysfs interface or replacing system to
    ram - just the suspend to disk part.

    Regards,

    Nigel
    --
    Evolution.
    Enumerate the requirements.
    Consider the interdependencies.
    Calculate the probabilities.
    Be amazed that people believe it happened.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-07-07 14:27    [W:0.020 / U:0.800 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site