lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12
From
Date
Hi.

On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:04, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com> wrote:
>
> > I've been thinking about this some more and wondering whether I should
> > just replace swsusp. I really don't want to step on your toes though.
> > What would you like to see happen?
>
> Do you implement the entire swsusp userspace interface? If not, removing
> it probably isn't a reasonable plan without fair warning.

I'm not suggesting removing the sysfs interface or replacing system to
ram - just the suspend to disk part.

Regards,

Nigel
--
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-07 14:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site