Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [26/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 603-suspend2_common-headers.patch | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Date | Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:41:15 +1000 |
| |
Hi.
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 20:22, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > diff -ruNp 604-utility-header.patch-old/kernel/power/suspend2_core/utility.h 604-utility-header.patch-new/kernel/power/suspend2_core/utility.h > > --- 604-utility-header.patch-old/kernel/power/suspend2_core/utility.h 1970-01-01 10:00:00.000000000 +1000 > > +++ 604-utility-header.patch-new/kernel/power/suspend2_core/utility.h 2005-07-05 23:48:59.000000000 +1000 > > Please do move these.
Okay.
> > + > > +extern int suspend_snprintf(char * buffer, int buffer_size, const char *fmt, ...); > > What's wrong with regular snprintf?
If there's a buffer overrun, it returns the number of bytes it wanted to use, not the number actually used.
Regards,
Nigel -- Evolution. Enumerate the requirements. Consider the interdependencies. Calculate the probabilities. Be amazed that people believe it happened.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |