Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [2/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 300-reboot-handler-hook.patch | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Date | Wed, 06 Jul 2005 20:18:24 +1000 |
| |
Hi.
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 20:08, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On 7/6/05, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@suspend2.net> wrote: > > diff -ruNp 301-proc-acpi-sleep-activate-hook.patch-old/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c 301-proc-acpi-sleep-activate-hook.patch-new/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c > > --- 301-proc-acpi-sleep-activate-hook.patch-old/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c 2005-06-20 11:46:50.000000000 +1000 > > +++ 301-proc-acpi-sleep-activate-hook.patch-new/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c 2005-07-04 23:14:18.000000000 +1000 > > @@ -68,6 +68,17 @@ acpi_system_write_sleep ( > > goto Done; > > } > > state = simple_strtoul(str, NULL, 0); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND2 > > + /* > > + * I used to put this after the CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND > > + * test, but people who compile in suspend2 usually want > > + * to use it instead of swsusp. --NC > > + */ > > + if (state == 4) { > > enum for states instead of magics, please.
Changed to ACPI_STATE_S4. Thanks!
Nigel
-- Evolution. Enumerate the requirements. Consider the interdependencies. Calculate the probabilities. Be amazed that people believe it happened.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |