![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 08:59:02AM +0200, Kurt Garloff wrote: > > The topic of replacing dummy (with capability) was discussed there > > last week, in the context of stacker, but a common solution for both > > cases would be needed. > > Both cases? CONFIG_SECURITY_STACKER and !CONFIG_SECURITY_STACKER ;-) http://mail.wirex.com/pipermail/linux-security-module/2005-June/6200.html I was assuming (bad of me I know) that Serge's patch would nail both cases with one stone. Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-07-04 10:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||