lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 4 Jul 2005 13:18:32 -0400
Fromstuddugie <>
SubjectRe: Linux and Plan-9ness
If you dropped the "Unixness" you would have to rename. Maybe Linine,
or  Linsoft, or ....
Think of all the chaos that would cause. You don't want chaos do you?
I mean really, do u want to force all the
\w*(?ilinux)\w*(\.(com|org|net))? sites and publications to rename
too? Unconscionable!
On 6/30/05, Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com> wrote:
> Markus   Törnqvist wrote: {
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 10:56:36PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> >instead of trying to get a monstrosity (albeit a very cool one,
> >conceptually) into the kernel.  Sure, it could be made to work, but not
> >without dropping our Unixness.  And if we do, we should start by
> >looking at Plan 9 =)
> 
> What's wrong with "dropping our Unixness" if it means taking an extra step
> toward Plan 9?
> 
> Why is this a bad idea?
> }
> 
> Please explain!
> 
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-04 19:21    [W:1.097 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans