![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote: > because end_buffer_async_read/write use bit_spin_(un)lock and I do not > know how those interact with -RT. bit_spin_lock is preemptible too - but it's not a too nice construct. What seems to have happened in your trace is that local_irq_disable() was used too in combination with bit-spinlocks, and a spinlock was taken from within it. The best fix would be to get rid of bit-spinlocks ... Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-07-31 12:46 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||