lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: oom-killings, but I'm not out of memory!
Howdy,

Roy Keene
Planning Systems Inc.

On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

>
> Hi Roy,
>
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 09:44:37PM -0500, Roy Keene wrote:
>> I think I'm having the same issue.
>>
>> I've 2 systems with 4GB of RAM and 2GB of swap that kill processes when
>> they get a lot of disk I/O. I've attached the full dmesg output which
>> includes portions where it killed stuff despite having massive amounts of
>> free memory.
>
> What kernel version is that?
>

Linux cog2 2.6.9-11.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri May 20 18:26:27 EDT 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux


>> oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0
>> Mem-info:
>> DMA per-cpu:
>> cpu 0 hot: low 2, high 6, batch 1
>> cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 2, batch 1
>> cpu 1 hot: low 2, high 6, batch 1
>> cpu 1 cold: low 0, high 2, batch 1
>> cpu 2 hot: low 2, high 6, batch 1
>> cpu 2 cold: low 0, high 2, batch 1
>> cpu 3 hot: low 2, high 6, batch 1
>> cpu 3 cold: low 0, high 2, batch 1
>> Normal per-cpu:
>> cpu 0 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16
>> cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16
>> cpu 1 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16
>> cpu 1 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16
>> cpu 2 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16
>> cpu 2 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16
>> cpu 3 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16
>> cpu 3 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16
>> HighMem per-cpu:
>> cpu 0 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16
>> cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16
>> cpu 1 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16
>> cpu 1 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16
>> cpu 2 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16
>> cpu 2 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16
>> cpu 3 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16
>> cpu 3 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16
>>
>> Free pages: 14304kB (1664kB HighMem)
>> Active:7971 inactive:994335 dirty:327523 writeback:25721 unstable:0 free:3576 slab:29113 mapped:7996 pagetables:341
>
> There are about 100M of writeout data onflight - I suppose thats too much.
>
> Guess: can you switch to another IO scheduler than CFQ or reduce its queue size?
>
> IIRC you can do that by reducing /sys/block/device/queue/nr_requests.
>

For all the devices I use this is set to 8192

I set "sda" to 512 now.

[root@cog2 ~]# cat /sys/block/{sda,nbd0,nbd1}/queue/nr_requests
8192
8192
8192


>> DMA free:12640kB min:16kB low:32kB high:48kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:16384kB pages_scanned:877 all_unreclaimable? yes
>> protections[]: 0 0 0
>>
>> Normal free:0kB min:928kB low:1856kB high:2784kB active:0kB inactive:739100kB present:901120kB pages_scanned:1556742 all_unreclaimable? yes
>> protections[]: 0 0 0
>
> You've got no reservations for the normal zone either.
>
> How does /proc/sys/vm/lowmem_reserve_ratio looks like?
>
>

It looks like it doesn't exist..
[root@cog2 ~]# ls /proc/sys/vm
block_dump dirty_ratio laptop_mode
max_map_count nr_pdflush_threads page-cluster
dirty_background_ratio dirty_writeback_centisecs legacy_va_layout
min_free_kbytes overcommit_memory swappiness
dirty_expire_centisecs hugetlb_shm_group lower_zone_protection
nr_hugepages overcommit_ratio vfs_cache_pressure
[root@cog2 ~]#
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-04 05:58    [W:0.211 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site