lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags

    * Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

    > Well, you can easily see suboptimal scheduling decisions on many
    > programs with lots of interprocess communication. For example, tbench
    > on a dual Xeon:
    >
    > processes 1 2 3 4
    >
    > 2.6.13-rc4: 187, 183, 179 260, 259, 256 340, 320, 349 504, 496, 500
    > no wake-bal: 180, 180, 177 254, 254, 253 268, 270, 348 345, 290, 500
    >
    > Numbers are MB/s, higher is better.

    what type of network was used - localhost or a real one?

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-07-29 11:00    [W:0.024 / U:0.416 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site