[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}{,_msecs}() interfaces
    On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 12:50 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
    > Hi,
    > On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    > > Also I'd rather not add the non-msec ones... either you're raw and use
    > > HZ, or you are "cooked" and use the msec variant.. I dont' see the point
    > > of adding an "in the middle" one. (Yes this means that several users
    > > need to be transformed to msecs but... I consider that progress ;)
    > What's wrong with using jiffies?

    A lot of the (driver) users want a wallclock based timeout. For that,
    miliseconds is a more obvious API with less chance to get the jiffies/HZ
    conversion wrong by the driver writer.

    > It's simple and the current timeout
    > system is based on it. Calling it something else doesn't suddenly give you
    > more precision.

    It's not about precision, it's about making the new API (which is
    intended to be a simplification already due to sucking in the state
    setting) match the intent closer.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-07-23 13:15    [W:0.028 / U:38.952 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site