[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
2005/7/21, Voluspa <>:
> 2h48m at 100 HZ
> 2h48m at 250 HZ
> 2h47m at 1000 HZ

Now, what would be interesting is to see if the lack of differences
comes from the fact that the processor has enough time to sleep,
not enough time, or simply it does not matter.

That is, is it a best case or a worst case ?

> #!/bin/sh
> touch time-hz-start
> while (true) do
> touch time-hz-end
> sleep 1m
> done

Why this ?
Why not simply nothing ?
A computer can be idle for more than 1 minute ;-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-21 20:54    [W:0.074 / U:1.668 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site