[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:

    > > That's like scratching your left ear with your right hand -- broadcasting
    > > that external timer interrupt in the first place is more straightforward.
    > > If you want to exclude CPUs from the list of receivers, just use the
    > > logical destination mode appropriately.
    > The problem with that is that it would need regular synchronizations
    > of all CPUs to coordinate this. Not good for scalability and I
    > believe the fundamentally wrong way to do this.

    What to you mean by "regular synchronizations of all CPUs?" And how is a
    broadcasted external timer interrupt different from a unicasted one
    redistributed further via an all-but-self IPI, except from removing an
    unnecessary burden from the CPU targeted by the unicast interrupt?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-07-18 12:50    [W:0.020 / U:2.288 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site