lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/82] changing CONFIG_LOCALVERSION rebuilds too much, for no good reason.
    On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 09:18:15PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
    > one for the SCSI subsystem. If those individual driver maintainers'
    > files are being modified, should they be CC'ed, or is the big patch
    > just sent to the SCSI maintainer (in this example)? I just want to
    > make sure the correct patch-chain is respected.

    As a patch maintainer, CCed on ONE of the 82 patches, I wouldn't have
    minded getting CCed on a patch that included the change to my driver.
    (as chunk xx/82 in the diff).

    Roger.

    --
    ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
    *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
    Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement.
    Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific!
    Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-07-17 10:32    [W:2.171 / U:0.480 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site