Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:28:52 +0200 | From | Rogier Wolff <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/82] changing CONFIG_LOCALVERSION rebuilds too much, for no good reason. |
| |
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 09:18:15PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > one for the SCSI subsystem. If those individual driver maintainers' > files are being modified, should they be CC'ed, or is the big patch > just sent to the SCSI maintainer (in this example)? I just want to > make sure the correct patch-chain is respected.
As a patch maintainer, CCed on ONE of the 82 patches, I wouldn't have minded getting CCed on a patch that included the change to my driver. (as chunk xx/82 in the diff).
Roger.
-- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement. Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific! Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |