lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
Hi!

> > Alan tested it and said that 250HZ does not save much power anyway.
>
> Len Brown, a year ago: "The bottom line number to laptop users is battery
> lifetime. Just today somebody complained to me that Windows gets twice the
> battery life that Linux does."
>
> And "Maybe I can get Andy Grover over in the moble lab to get some time on
> that fancy power measurement setup they have...
>
> "My expectation is if we want to beat the competition, we'll want the
> ability to go *under* 100Hz."
>
> But then, power consumption of the display should preponderate, so it's not
> clear.
>
> Len, any updates on the relationship between HZ and power consumption?

Last time I checked, HZ=100 to HZ=1000 difference was about 1W, about
twice as much as disk spinning up vs. disk spinned down.
Pavel
--
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-16 15:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site